Uterine microbiome and endometrial receptivity
Authors:
I. Crha 1,2
; P. Ventruba 1; J. Žáková 1; M. Ješeta 1; R. Pilka 3; E. Lousová 1; Z. Papíková 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika LF MU a FN, Brno, přednosta prof. MUDr. P. Ventruba, DrSc., MBA
1; Katedra porodní asistence a zdravotnických záchranářů LF MU, Brno, přednosta doc. MUDr. I. Crha, CSc.
2; Porodnicko-gynekologická klinika FN a LF UP, Olomouc, přednosta prof. MUDr. R. Pilka, Ph. D.
3
Published in:
Ceska Gynekol 2019; 84(1): 49-54
Category:
Overview
Objective: Structure and correct function of endometrium is necessary for embryo implantation, pregnancy development and childbirth. It is a result of many factors – anatomical and histological structure, hormonal effects and signalling pathways at the molecular genetic level. A little known phenomenon is the presence of microorganisms on the endometrium. Traditionally, the uterine cavity was considered sterile, but new findings have been changing this view fundamentally. The aim of this work is to present new findings on endometrial microbiome and its importance for embryo implantation and development.
Design: Review article.
Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University Olomouc.
Methods: PubMed was searched for articles in English indexed until 30th June 2018 with terms of „uterine microbiome analysis“ and „endometrial receptivity“.
Results: The vital information on bacterial colonization of endometrium brought new diagnostic methods for their detection based on ribosomal RNA analysis in 16S subunit, which are capable of detection and exact identification of bacteria that cannot be detected by classical cultivation methods. The endometrial microbiome is assumed to modulate the function of endometrial cells and local immunity system, it prevents growth of pathogenic microorganisms by its presence and production of protective substances.
Conclusion: Endometrial microbiome seems to be important factor of endometrial receptivity.
Keywords:
endometrium – uterine microbiome – embryo implantation – endometrial receptivity
Sources
1. Benner, M., Ferwerda, G., Irma Joosten, I., et al. How uterine microbiota might be responsible for a receptive, fertile endometrium. Hum Reprod Update, 2018, 24(4), p. 393–415.
2. Botos, I., Sega, DM., Davies, DR. The structural biology of toll-like receptors. Structure, 2011, 19, p. 447–459.
3. Buck, VU., Windoffer, R., Leube, RE., Classen-Linke, I. Redistribution of adhering junctions in human endometrial epithelial cells during the implantation window of the menstrual cycle. Histochem Cell Biol, 2012, 137, p. 777–790.
4. Burton, GJ., Jauniaux, E., Charnock-Jones, DS. The influence of the intrauterine environment on human placental development. Int J Dev Biol, 2010, 54, p. 303–312.
5. Dvořan, M., Vodička, J., Dostál, J., et al. Implantace a diagnostika receptivity endometria. Čes Gynek, 2018, 83(4), s. 291–299.
6. Franasiak, JM., Scott, RT, Jr. Reproductive tract microbiome in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril, 2015, 104, p. 1364–1371.
7. Franasiak, JM., Scott, RT. Endometrial microbiome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 29, p. 146–152.
8. Franasiak, JM., Werner, MD., Juneau, CR., et al. Endometrial microbiome at the time of embryo transfer: next-generation sequencing of the 16 S ribosomal subunit. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2016, 33, p. 129–136.
9. Geva-Zatorsky, N., Sefik, E., Kua, L., et al. Mining the human gut microbiota for immunomodulatory organisms. Cell, 2017, 168, p. 928–943.
10. Hooper, LV., Littman, DR., Macpherson, AJ. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science, 2012, 336, p. 1268–1273.
11. Ivanov, II., Atarashi, K., Manel, N., et al. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell, 2009, 139, p. 485–498.
12. Macpherson, AJ., de Aguero, MG., Ganal-Vonarburg, SC. How nutrition and the maternal microbiota shape the neonatal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol, 2017, 10, p. 508–517.
13. Miles, SM., Hardy, BL., Merrell, DS. Investigation of the microbiota of the reproductive tract in women undergoing a total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooopherectomy. Fertil Steril, 2017,107, p. 813–820.
14. Mitchell, CM., Haick, A., Nkwopara, E., et al. Colonization of the upper genital tract by vaginal bacterial species in nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212, p. 611–619.
15. Moore, DE., Soules, MR., Klein, NA., et al. Bacteria in the transfer catheter tip influence the live-birth rate after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril, 2000,74, p. 1118–1124.
16. Moreno, I., Franasiak, JM. Endometrial microbiota—new player in town. Fertil Steril, 2017, 108, p. 32–39.
17. Postler, TS., Ghosh, S. Understanding the holobiont: how microbial metabolites affect human health and shape the immune system. Cell Metab, 2017, 26, p. 110–130.
18. Power, ML., Quaglieri, C., Schulkin, J. Reproductive microbiomes. Reprod Sci, 2017, 24, p. 1482–1492.
19. Prince, AL., Ma, J., Kannan, PS., et al. The placental membrane microbiome is altered among subjects with spontaneous preterm birth with and without chorioamnionitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 214, p. 621–627.
20. Selman, H., Mariani, M., Barnocchi, N., et al. Examination of bacterial contamination at the time of embryo transfer, and its impact on the IVF/pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2007, 24, p. 395–399.
21. Sirota, I., Zarek, SM., Segars, JH. Potential influence of the microbiome on infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Semin Reprod Med, 2014, 32, p. 35–42.
22. Swiecki, M., Miller, HL., Sesti-Costa, R., et al. Microbiota induces tonic CCL2 systemic levels that control pDC trafficking in steady state. Mucosal Immunol, 2017, 10, p. 936–945.
23. Ulčová-Gallová, Z., Pešek, M., Chaloupka, P., et al. Screening of endometrial NK cells in selected infertile patients. First part – Methods and current results. Čes Gynek, 2017, 82(5), p. 366–371.
24. Ventruba, P., Žáková, J., Trávník P., et al. Aktuální otázky asistované reprodukce v České republice. Čes Gynek, 2013, 78(4), s. 392–398.
25. Ventruba, P., Žáková, J., Ješeta, M., et al. Současná témata reprodukční medicíny v České republice. Čes Gynek, 2016, 81(3), s. 234–240.
26. Vodička, J., Dvořan, M., Smékalová, K., et al. Možnosti přípravy endometria ke kryotransferu. Čes Gynek, 2018, 83(1), s. 24–28.
27. Wira, CR., Grant-Tschudy, KS., Crane-Godreau, MA. Epithelial cells in the female reproductive tract: a central role as sentinels of immune protection. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2005, 53, p. 65–76.
Labels
Paediatric gynaecology Gynaecology and obstetrics Reproduction medicineArticle was published in
Czech Gynaecology
2019 Issue 1
Most read in this issue
- Endometriosis in pregnancy – diagnostics and management
- Diagnostics and modern trends in therapy of postpartum depression
- Cervical cerclage – history and contemporary use
- Uterine microbiome and endometrial receptivity