Efficacy and Safety of Solifenacin in Daily Clinical Practice – Clinical Study Phase IV


Authors: J. Krhut;  O. Havránek;  D. Míka;  M. Fabišovský;  P. Vališ
Authors‘ workplace: Urologické oddělení FN Ostrava – Poruba, primář MUDr. J. Krhut, Ph. D.
Published in: Ceska Gynekol 2008; 73(6): 370-375

Overview

Objective:
Symptoms of urinary urgency, frequency, nocturia with/or without urge incontinence, are reffered to as the overactive bladder (OAB). Main option for the treatment of the OAB are anticholinergic agents. The aim of the paper is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the solifenacin in the daily clinical practice.

Material and methods:
344 patients with OAB symptoms (311 women, 33 men, average age 57,04 years) were enrolled into the study. Patients were treated with solifenacin 5 mg or solifenacin 10 mg in the flexible dosing regimen.

Efficacy data were obtained from the validated questionnaries and micturion diaries. Safety assessment was based on adverse event reporting.

Results:
We observed a highly significant reduction of bladder problems caused by OAB (Patient Perception of Bladder Condition – PPBC/PBC score 4.83 at baseline to 3.29 at endpoint). The decrease of micturion frequency from baseline to endpoint was 31.19 %, decrease of episodes of nocturia was 54.65 % and decrease of incontinence episodes was 90.19%.

Average number of urgency episodes decresed from 12.46/day at baseline to 7.28/day at endpoint (41.6%). Average urgency severity decreased from 2.43 at baseline to 1.55 at endpoint (-37.4%).

Adverse events were reported in 19 patients (5.52%) between visits 1 and 2 and in 16 patients (4,68%) between visits 2 and 3.

Conclusions:
Results of our phase IV. study showed the excellent efficacy and safety profile of solifenacin in the treatment of OAB in accordance with results of published phase III. clinical studies.

Key words:
urinary incontinence, detrusor, urgency, anticholinergics.


Sources

1. Abrams, P., Wein, AJ. The overactive bladder: from basic science to clinical management. Urology, 1997, 50,Suppl. 6, p. 1-3.

2. Milsom, I., Abrams, P., Cardozo, L., et al. How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study. BJU Int, 2001, 87, p. 760-766.

3. Scarpero, HM., Dmochowski, RR. Muscarinic receptors: what we know. Curr Urol Rep, 2003, 4, 6, p. 421-428.

4. Viktrup, L., Summers, KH., Dennett, SL. Clinical practice guidelines for the initial management of urinary incontinence in women: a European-focused review. BJU Int, 2004, 94, Suppl 1, p. 14-22.

5. Martan, A. Novinky v medikamentózní léčbě inkontinence moči u žen. Čas lék čes, 2006, 145, 7, p. 549-553.

6. Coyne, KS., Matza, LS., Kopp, Z., et al. The validation of the patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC): a single-item global measure for patients with overactive bladder. Eur Urol, 2006, 49, 6, p. 1079-1086.

7. Cardozo, L., Coyne, KS., Versi, E. Validation of the urgency perception scale. BJU Int, 2005, 95, 4, p. 591-596.

8. Millard, RJ., Halaska, M. Efficacy of solifenacin in patients with severe symptoms of overactive bladder: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin, 2006, 22, 1, p. 41-48.

9. Chapple, CR., Cardozzo, L., Steers, WD., et al. Solifenacin significantly improves all symptoms of overactive bladder syndrome. Int J Clin Pract, 2006, 60, 8, p. 959-966.

10. Haab, F., Cardozo, L., Chapple, C., et al. Long-term open-label solifenacin treatment asociated with persistence with therapy in patients with overactive bladdder syndrome. Eur Urol, 2005, 47, p. 376-384.

11. Kelleher, CJ., Cardozo, L., Chapple, C., et al. Improved quality of life in patients with overactive bladder symptoms treated with solifenacin. BJU Int, 2005, 95, p. 81-85.

Labels
Paediatric gynaecology Gynaecology and obstetrics Reproduction medicine
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account